I have spent the better part of the last month preparing settlement documents in a big case for a substantial settlement. This was my first time to ever prepare settlement documents, and I was pretty much left to wing it.
But I pulled it off. There are 5 parties involved in this settlement, and we had everybody in agreement by the 5th revision--and most of the changes were pretty minor. So I was feeling pretty good about getting it right on my first go 'round. In total, the settlement documents exceed 60 pages. I did 95% of the drafting--incorporating changes by the other parties as requested.
Then, an ad litem was appointed at the last minute who wanted to make several changes, including adding an addendum. So I spent half a day incorporating all of his changes, and again, submitted the agreement to all parties for final approval. Big Boss told me to ask the other parties to please make any changes they wanted and circulate them among the parties. (They have, so far, been submitting revisions to us and I have been making all changes.)
Within a couple of hours, one of the parties approved the new changes. But I just got an email (cc'd to about 10 people) from another party saying, "We're still reviewing the settlement documents, but you spelled 'Addendum' wrong in the footer of that document, and in paragraph 13 of [65 paragraph document] [one party out of about 17] is referred to as a he rather than a she."
Thank you very much Big Law a-hole. Because you couldn't have included those two mistakes that were admittedly mine in the list of the other changes that needed to be made (although seriously, in a footer with an 8 point font can you even tell the difference between an "n" and an "m"?) God knows I fixed some of your mistakes without advertising it to the world. Or are you just PO'd that we asked you to make your own changes this time?
I am sure to be bitched out on Monday about this. Big Boss will not be happy that I sent out a document with a spelling error.
Sigh--what a way to ruin a perfectly good Sunday afternoon.
P.S. Yes, I get the irony. If you spend any time at all on my blog you will find it riddled with typos. I spend minimal time proofing here. But I swear, I combed those documents. All 60 pages, line by line with a ruler. Guess I missed the footer. And the red squiggly line that Word should have put under my misspelling.
4 comments:
Everyone will know that guy for an a**hole. No one is perfect, and EVERYONE sends out documents with proofing errors. Everyone.
It just makes the guy look like he had his pants down - he "hasn't finished" but snaps out minor typos? Geez louise, if the worst someone can say about an agreement with so many parties and changes is that you screwed up a pronoun here or there, you did a great job.
Somewhere in the office there is a beautiful, snarky letter someone sent my boss about the ways he butchered the English language in a demand letter. (He didn't, not really. It nitpicked diction.) I really need to find that thing and blog it. It's hilarious.
Fucking BigLaw asshole litigators. Sorry girl. Ugh.
Hey, I'm going to be up in your area (I think) next week. Feel like a drink?
What an ASS! I am in big law and I have had stuff sent back to me becuase of an extra space between words. That's right SPACES! You think we would all better things..
OMG--spaces??? I couldn't take it.
Clearly these things needed to be fixed. But he could have quietly fixed them himself (like I did for him on an earlier revision) or emailed them to me without cc'ing everybody, or even just included them in the list of other things that needed to be revised.
Stuff like this is why people think lawyers are a-holes.
Post a Comment